Team collaborating

Calculating the True ROI of a Retained Search

When considering a retained executive search, it's easy to focus on the upfront cost—the retainer fee. However, the true value of the investment is not in the fee itself, but in the massive return on investment (ROI) that a superior hire generates. A cheap or failed search process is infinitely more expensive than a successful retained one.

To understand the ROI, you must look beyond the fee and quantify the impact of a top-performing executive vs. an average one.

The Cost of a Bad Hire

First, consider the alternative. The U.S. Department of Labor estimates the cost of a bad hire can be at least 30% of the employee's first-year earnings. For an executive, this is a conservative estimate. The true costs include:

A rigorous retained process is fundamentally a risk mitigation strategy designed to prevent this catastrophic outcome.

The Upside of a Great Hire (The "A-Player" Impact)

Studies by McKinsey and others have shown that top performers (A-Players) are not just slightly better, but exponentially more productive than average performers (B-Players). In complex, senior-level roles, this difference can be as high as 400%.

Think about the financial impact a great hire can make:

A Simple ROI Framework

While precise calculation is complex, you can use this framework:

(Value Generated by New Hire - Total Investment) / Total Investment = ROI

When you run the numbers, the search fee—the cost of ensuring you get that A-Player—becomes a small and obviously worthwhile investment for the massive upside it unlocks.